The CNMI Supreme Court ruled today that the CNMI laws do not permit the Superior Court to order unemployed judgment debtors to seek work.
The case, Marianas Eye Institute v. Pitness Moses, 2011 MP 1, involved a Chuukese man who worked for six years in the garment industry and then lost his job when the industry left the islands. He has been unemployed ever since. While unemployed, he was bushcutting and something flew into his eye, so he sought help at the Commonwealth Health Center. The CHC referred him to Dr. Khorram's clinic, the Marianas Eye Institute. Neither Moses nor the clinic inquired about how Moses would pay--he assumed that the same assistance program offered by the hospital to FSM citizens (the MIAP program) would cover him at the private clinic. It didn't. He ended up with a $300+ debt that he couldn't afford.
Attorney Mike White represented MEI in a collection case and Moses stipulated to a judgment. In post-judgment proceedings, MEI agreed with Moses that he had no income or assets from which he could pay. MEI asked the court to order Moses to get a job. Failure to comply with such a court order could result in civil contempt and jail.
Moses had been looking for work already for years, without success. The work situation in the CNMI is difficult, with few jobs and a near-death economy. Despite his efforts, he had not found work.
Moses objected to the order because it was futile, and he would face jail time if he didn't comply exactly with the court's demands. In other cases, we have seen the court continue to increase its demands so that unemployed debtors are required to submit more and more applications every week; and in order to avoid the potential for jail the debtors resort to submitting useless paperwork to businesses who are not even looking for employees. The court also typically requires the debtors to report back in frequent periodic hearings, which clog the docket and often lead judges into the temptation to give tongue-lashings and verbal reprimands simply because of the debtor's continued poverty and unemployment.
The CNMI Supreme Court examined all prior appellate cases in the CNMI and looked at cases from Guam, Illinois, and other jurisdictions. In the end, the court was convinced that the CNMI statute, which allows the court to order "payments," did not expressly authorize the court to order job searches as a means of enforcing ordinary judgment debts.
The CNMI Supreme Court also said that, once the Superior Court found that there were no income or assets from which payment could be made, it could not make any order in aid of judgment.
This small victory will provide enormous relief to many people who are currently in dire economic conditions, without work but owing debt.